Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

未

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 5 strokes

un-, not yet, hitherto

穂

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 15 strokes

ear, ear (grain), head

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both11

Distinct written forms11

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 未穂 forms5

Adjacent 穂未 forms1

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

未穂梨

Mihori

みほり

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 未 and 穂Given name

未穂

Miho

みほ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 穂Given name

未穂子

Mihoko

みほこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 穂Given name

未寿穂

Mizuho

みずほ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 穂Given name

穂奈未

Honami

ほなみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 穂Given name

史穂未

Shihomi

しほみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 穂Given name

未知穂

Michiho

みちほ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 穂Given name

未奈穂

Minaho

みなほ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 穂Given name

未来穂

Mikiho

みきほ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 穂Given name

悠未穂

Yumiho

ゆみほ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 穂

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.