Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
未
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 5 strokes
歩un-, not yet, hitherto
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 8 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →walk, counter for steps
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
未来歩
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameMiho
みほ
歩奈未
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameHonami
ほなみ
歩未
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameAyumi
あゆみ
歩未
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameAmi
あみ
歩未
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameFumi
ふみ
未歩子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameMihoko
みほこ
未津歩
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameMizuho
みずほ
紫歩未
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameShihomi
しほみ
未歩那
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameMihona
みほな
未歩子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameMiako
みあこ
歩未
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameHomi
ほみ
未夢歩
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Given nameMiyua
みゆあ
未来歩
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 歩Mikuho
みくほ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.