Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

未

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 5 strokes

un-, not yet, hitherto

智

Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 9 · 12 strokes

wisdom, intellect, reason

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both10

Distinct written forms9

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 未智 forms5

Adjacent 智未 forms2

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

智未

Satomi

さとみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 智Given name

智未

Tomomi

ともみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 智Given name

未智

Misato

みさと

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 智Given name

未智子

Michiko

みちこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 智Given name

未智代

Michiyo

みちよ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 智Given name

智英未

Chiemi

ちえみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 智Given name

未智琉

Michiru

みちる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 智Given name

智菜未

Chinami

ちなみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 智Given name

未智麿

Michimaro

みちまろ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 智Given name

那智未

Nachimi

なちみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 未 and 智

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.