Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
音
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 9 strokes
麗sound, noise
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 19 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →lovely, beautiful, graceful
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
詩音麗
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameShiori
しおり
桜音麗
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameSaori
さおり
麗音
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameRio
りお
音麗
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameMirei
みれい
麗音
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameRion
りおん
麗音
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameReon
れおん
麗音
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameRein
れいん
麗音
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameRine
りね
音麗
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameNeri
ねり
麗音
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameReine
れいね
麗音
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameRene
れね
紅麗音
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Given nameKureo
くれお
世麗音
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 音 and 麗Serene
せれね
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.