Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

雄

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 12 strokes

masculine, male, hero

太

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 4 strokes

plump, thick, big around

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both13

Distinct written forms12

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 雄太 forms3

Adjacent 太雄 forms2

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

太華雄

Takao

たかお

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 雄 and 太Given name

雄太朗

Yūtarō

ゆうたろう

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 雄 and 太Given name

太刀雄

Tachio

たちお

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 雄 and 太Given name

太雄

Motō

もとお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 雄 and 太Given name

佐太雄

Sadao

さだお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 雄 and 太Given name

太喜雄

Takio

たきお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 雄 and 太Given name

太美雄

Tamio

たみお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 雄 and 太Given name

雄太

Yūta

ゆうた

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 雄 and 太Given name

太子雄

Taneo

たねお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 雄 and 太Given name

太四雄

Tashio

たしお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 雄 and 太

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.