Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
金
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 8 strokes
郎gold
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →son, counter for sons
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
金久郎
6 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Given nameKinjirō
きんじろう
金三郎
4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Given nameKinsaburō
きんさぶろう
金一郎
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Given nameKin'ichirō
きんいちろう
金五郎
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Given nameKingorō
きんごろう
金多郎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Given nameKintarō
きんたろう
金子郎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Given nameKaneo
かねお
金四郎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Given nameKinshirō
きんしろう
金三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Given nameKinzaburō
きんざぶろう
金郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Given nameKanao
かなお
金三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Given nameKanesaburō
かねさぶろう
金治郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Given nameKanejirō
かねじろう
金太郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 金 and 郎Kanetarō
かねたろう
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.