Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
部
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 11 strokes
野section, bureau, dept
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 11 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →plains, field, rustic
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
井野部
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameInobe
いのべ
安部野
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameAbeno
あべの
川野部
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameKawanobe
かわのべ
野部
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameYabe
やべ
山野部
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameYamanobe
やまのべ
美野部
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameMinobe
みのべ
野部
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameNobe
のべ
渡野部
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameWatanobe
わたのべ
野部
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameNobu
のぶ
小野部
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameOnobe
おのべ
戸野部
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameTonobe
とのべ
物野部
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 部 and 野SurnameMononobe
もののべ
吉野部
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 部 and 野Yoshinobe
よしのべ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.