Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
近
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 7 strokes
江near, early, akin
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 6 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →creek, inlet, bay
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
近江屋
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameŌmiya
おおみや
近江屋
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameŌmiya
おうみや
近江
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameŌmi
おおみ
近江
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameŌe
おおえ
近江
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameŌe
おうえ
近江
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameŌmi
おうみ
近江
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameKōmi
こうみ
近江
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameOnoe
おのえ
近江
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameKonoe
このえ
近江
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameNobue
のぶえ
近江園
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameŌen
おおえん
近江
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 近 and 江SurnameNīe
にいえ
近江川
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 近 and 江Ōmikawa
おおみかわ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.