Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
貴
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 6 · 12 strokes
郎precious, value, prize
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →son, counter for sons
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
貴一郎
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Given nameKīchirō
きいちろう
貴多郎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Given nameKitarō
きたろう
貴四郎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Given nameKishirō
きしろう
貴郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Given nameYoshio
よしお
貴郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Given nameTakao
たかお
貴郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Given nameTakayoshi
たかよし
貴三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Given nameKisaburō
きさぶろう
貴八郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Given nameKihachirō
きはちろう
貴七郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Given nameKishichirō
きしちろう
貴郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Given nameKirō
きろう
貴一郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Given nameTakaichirō
たかいちろう
貴志三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 郎Kishisaburō
きしさぶろう
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.