Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
貴
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 6 · 12 strokes
田precious, value, prize
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 5 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →rice field, rice paddy
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
冨貴田
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameFukita
ふきた
貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameKida
きだ
田貴
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameTaki
たき
貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameKita
きた
戸貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameTokita
ときた
真貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameMakita
まきた
貴師田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameKishida
きしだ
貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameTakada
たかだ
貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameTokida
ときだ
富貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameFukida
ふきだ
福貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameFukukita
ふくきた
貴田岡
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田SurnameKitaoka
きたおか
山田貴
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 貴 and 田Yamataki
やまたき
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.