Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
豊
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 13 strokes
子bountiful, excellent, rich
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 3 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →child, sign of the rat, 11PM-1AM
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
万豊子
4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Given nameMahoko
まほこ
豊子
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Given nameTomiko
とみこ
豊己子
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Given nameTokiko
ときこ
実豊子
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Given nameMihoko
みほこ
豊代子
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Given nameToyoko
とよこ
豊子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Given nameYoshiko
よしこ
豊子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Given nameHiroko
ひろこ
豊美子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Given nameFumiko
ふみこ
豊子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Given nameReiko
れいこ
豊子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Given nameAtsuko
あつこ
豊子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Given nameHōko
ほうこ
豊日子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 豊 and 子Toyohiko
とよひこ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.