Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
見
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 7 strokes
安see, hopes, chances
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 6 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →relax, cheap, low
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
安佑見
11 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 見 and 安Given nameAyumi
あゆみ
安佐見
5 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 見 and 安Given nameAsami
あさみ
安見恵
5 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 見 and 安Given nameAmie
あみえ
安見児
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 見 and 安Given nameAmiko
あみこ
安見乃
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 見 and 安Given nameAmino
あみの
安見世
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 見 and 安Given nameAmiyo
あみよ
安見
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 見 and 安Given nameAmi
あみ
安見
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 見 and 安SurnameYasumi
やすみ
安見
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 見 and 安SurnameAzumi
あずみ
安見
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 見 and 安SurnameYasumi
やすみ
安見
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 見 and 安Given nameAmi
あみ
見安子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 見 and 安SurnameMiako
みあこ
安見
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 見 and 安Anmi
あんみ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.