Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

裕

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 12 strokes

abundant, rich, fertile

貴

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 6 · 12 strokes

precious, value, prize

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both10

Distinct written forms7

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 裕貴 forms5

Adjacent 貴裕 forms2

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

裕貴子

Yukiko

ゆきこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 裕 and 貴Given name

裕貴

Yūki

ゆうき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 裕 and 貴Given name

裕貴

Yuki

ゆき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 裕 and 貴Given name

美裕貴

Miyuki

みゆき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 裕 and 貴Given name

裕貴

Hiroki

ひろき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 裕 and 貴Given name

貴裕

Takahiro

たかひろ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 裕 and 貴Given name

裕貴乃

Yukino

ゆきの

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 裕 and 貴Given name

裕貴

Hirotaka

ひろたか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 裕 and 貴Given name

裕貴代

Yukiyo

ゆきよ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 裕 and 貴Given name

貴裕美

Kiyumi

きゆみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 裕 and 貴

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.