Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

華

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 10 strokes

splendor, flower, petal

寿

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 7 strokes

longevity, congratulations, one's natural life

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both15

Distinct written forms14

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 華寿 forms4

Adjacent 寿華 forms8

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

亜寿華

Asuka

あすか

4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 華 and 寿Given name

華寿実

Kazumi

かずみ

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 華 and 寿Given name

志寿華

Shizuka

しずか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 華 and 寿Given name

華寿子

Kazuko

かずこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 寿Given name

華寿美

Kasumi

かすみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 寿Given name

寿々華

Suzuka

すずか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 寿Given name

華寿奈

Kazuna

かずな

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 寿Given name

美寿華

Mizuka

みずか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 寿Given name

寿冬華

Kotoka

ことか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 寿Given name

寿華

Juka

じゅか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 寿

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.