Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

華

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 10 strokes

splendor, flower, petal

優

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 6 · 17 strokes

tenderness, excel, surpass

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both18

Distinct written forms16

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 華優 forms0

Adjacent 優華 forms8

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

優曇華

Yūka

ゆうか

5 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 華 and 優Given name

亜優華

Ayuka

あゆか

4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 華 and 優Given name

優三華

Yumika

ゆみか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 華 and 優Given name

優華

Yuka

ゆか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 優Given name

優里華

Yurika

ゆりか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 優Given name

真優華

Mayuka

まゆか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 優Given name

優華

Yūna

ゆうな

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 優Given name

優衣華

Yuika

ゆいか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 優Given name

布優華

Fuyuka

ふゆか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 優Given name

優華奈

Yukana

ゆかな

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 華 and 優

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.