Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
良
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 7 strokes
久good, pleasing, skilled
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 3 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →long time, old story
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
久良岐
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameKuraki
くらき
久多良岐
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameKutaraki
くたらき
佐久良
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameSakura
さくら
久良知
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameKurachi
くらち
久良
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameKura
くら
伊久良
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameIkura
いくら
久良持
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameKuramochi
くらもち
久多良
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameKudara
くだら
久良持
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameKuraji
くらじ
久良夫
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameKurao
くらお
久良
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameKurō
くろう
良久
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 良 and 久SurnameRaku
らく
保久良
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 良 and 久Yakura
やくら
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.