Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

羽

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 6 strokes

feathers, counter for birds, rabbits

留

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 10 strokes

detain, fasten, halt

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both11

Distinct written forms11

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 羽留 forms8

Adjacent 留羽 forms2

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

羽留佳

Haruka

はるか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 羽 and 留Given name

羽留奈

Haruna

はるな

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 羽 and 留Given name

未羽留

Miharu

みはる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 羽 and 留Given name

羽留子

Haruko

はるこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 羽 and 留Given name

胡羽留

Koharu

こはる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 羽 and 留Given name

羽留

Haru

はる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 羽 and 留Given name

留羽

Rū

るう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 羽 and 留Given name

羽留咲

Harusa

はるさ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 羽 and 留Given name

亜留羽

Aruha

あるは

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 羽 and 留Given name

羽良留

Uraru

うらる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 羽 and 留

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.