Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
美
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 9 strokes
田beauty, beautiful
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 5 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →rice field, rice paddy
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
美濃田
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameMinoda
みのだ
美田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameYoshida
よしだ
寿美田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameSumita
すみた
美田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameMita
みた
美田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameYoshita
よした
田々美
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameTatami
たたみ
加美田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameKamita
かみた
美田村
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameMitamura
みたむら
美田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameHaruta
はるた
喜美田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameKimita
きみた
美野田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameMinota
みのた
久美田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田SurnameKumita
くみた
美和田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 美 and 田Miwada
みわだ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.