Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

絵

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 12 strokes

picture, drawing, painting

佳

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 8 strokes

excellent, beautiful, good

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both19

Distinct written forms18

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 絵佳 forms4

Adjacent 佳絵 forms4

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

絵利佳

Erika

えりか

6 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 絵 and 佳Given name

亜絵佳

Aeka

あえか

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 絵 and 佳Given name

佳奈絵

Kanae

かなえ

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 絵 and 佳Given name

絵未佳

Emika

えみか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 絵 and 佳Given name

佳絵

Yoshie

よしえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 絵 and 佳Given name

佳絵

Kae

かえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 絵 and 佳Given name

佳絵子

Kaeko

かえこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 絵 and 佳Given name

和佳絵

Wakae

わかえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 絵 and 佳Given name

利絵佳

Rieka

りえか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 絵 and 佳Given name

由佳絵

Yukae

ゆかえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 絵 and 佳

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.