Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

結

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 12 strokes

tie, bind, contract

華

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 10 strokes

splendor, flower, petal

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both13

Distinct written forms9

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 結華 forms6

Adjacent 華結 forms0

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

結愛華

Yūka

ゆうか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 結 and 華Given name

真結華

Mayuka

まゆか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 結 and 華Given name

結愛華

Yuika

ゆいか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 結 and 華Given name

結華

Yuka

ゆか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 結 and 華Given name

愛結華

Ayuka

あゆか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 結 and 華Given name

結梨華

Yurika

ゆりか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 結 and 華Given name

結華子

Yukako

ゆかこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 結 and 華Given name

結愛華

Yumeka

ゆめか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 結 and 華Given name

咲結華

Sayuka

さゆか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 結 and 華Given name

華心結

Kamiyu

かみゆ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 結 and 華

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.