Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

紗

Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 9 · 10 strokes

gauze, gossamer

希

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 7 strokes

hope, beg, request

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both20

Distinct written forms20

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 紗希 forms14

Adjacent 希紗 forms2

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

光紗希

Misaki

みさき

4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 紗 and 希Given name

紗希恵

Sakie

さきえ

4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 紗 and 希Given name

紗悠希

Sayuki

さゆき

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 紗 and 希Given name

希紗羅

Kisara

きさら

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 紗 and 希Given name

千紗希

Chisaki

ちさき

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 紗 and 希Given name

紗希

Saki

さき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紗 and 希Given name

紗希子

Sakiko

さきこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紗 and 希Given name

紗津希

Satsuki

さつき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紗 and 希Given name

日紗希

Hisaki

ひさき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紗 and 希Given name

里紗希

Risaki

りさき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紗 and 希

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.