Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

純

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 6 · 10 strokes

genuine, purity, innocence

郎

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes

son, counter for sons

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both16

Distinct written forms12

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 純郎 forms1

Adjacent 郎純 forms0

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

純一郎

Junichirō

じゅにちろう

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 純 and 郎Given name

純二郎

Junjirō

じゅんじろう

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 純 and 郎Given name

純司郎

Junshirō

じゅんしろう

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 純 and 郎Given name

純郎

Ayao

あやお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 純 and 郎Given name

純郎

Sumio

すみお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 純 and 郎Given name

純三郎

Junsaburō

じゅんさぶろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 純 and 郎Given name

純太郎

Juntarō

じゅんたろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 純 and 郎Given name

純郎

Junrō

じゅんろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 純 and 郎Given name

純三郎

Junzaburō

じゅんざぶろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 純 and 郎Given name

純五郎

Jungorō

じゅんごろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 純 and 郎

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.