Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
紅
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 6 · 9 strokes
葉crimson, deep red
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 12 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →leaf, plane, lobe
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
紅玲葉
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameKureha
くれは
葉紅
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameYōko
ようこ
紅乃葉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameKonoha
このは
紅葉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameIroha
いろは
紅葉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameKōyō
こうよう
紅葉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameAgeha
あげは
紅葉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameAkaha
あかは
紅葉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameKaede
かえで
葉紅
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameHaku
はく
紅葉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameMomiji
もみじ
紅葉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameMomi
もみ
紅葉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Given nameAkeha
あけは
紅葉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 紅 and 葉Moyo
もよ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.