Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
精
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 14 strokes
郎refined, ghost, fairy
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →son, counter for sons
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
精一郎
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Given nameSeīchirō
せいいちろう
精五郎
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Given nameSeigorō
せいごろう
精多郎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Given nameSeitarō
せいたろう
精二郎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Given nameSeijirō
せいじろう
精四郎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Given nameSeishirō
せいしろう
精三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Given nameSeizaburō
せいざぶろう
精三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Given nameSeisaburō
せいさぶろう
精郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Given nameSeirō
せいろう
精八郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Given nameSeihachirō
せいはちろう
精七郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Given nameSeishichirō
せいしちろう
精四郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Given nameKiyoshirō
きよしろう
精十郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 精 and 郎Seijūrō
せいじゅうろう
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.