Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
穂
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 15 strokes
寿ear, ear (grain), head
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 7 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →longevity, congratulations, one's natural life
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
実寿穂
5 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Given nameMizuho
みずほ
穂寿実
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Given nameHozumi
ほずみ
三寿穂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Given nameMisuzu
みすず
寿穂子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Given nameShihoko
しほこ
歌寿穂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Given nameKazuho
かずほ
志寿穂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Given nameShizuho
しずほ
祐寿穂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Given nameYuzuho
ゆずほ
寿穂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Given nameSumiho
すみほ
千寿穂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Given nameChizuho
ちずほ
寿穂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Given nameHisaho
ひさほ
万寿穂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Given nameMasuho
ますほ
安寿穂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 穂 and 寿Asuho
あすほ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.