Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
祈
Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 10 · 9 strokes
子KANJIDIC2 character record
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 3 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →child, sign of the rat, 11PM-1AM
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
亜祈子
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Given nameAkiko
あきこ
万祈子
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Given nameMakiko
まきこ
実祈子
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Given nameMikiko
みきこ
優祈子
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Given nameYukiko
ゆきこ
祈実子
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Given nameKimiko
きみこ
祈恵子
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Given nameKieko
きえこ
祈子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Given nameNoriko
のりこ
祈子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Given nameReiko
れいこ
祈子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Given nameMotoko
もとこ
祈求子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Given nameKikuko
きくこ
祈子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Given nameKiko
きこ
祈環子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 祈 and 子Kiwako
きわこ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.