Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

真

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 10 strokes

true, reality, Buddhist sect

栄

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 9 strokes

flourish, prosperity, honor

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both10

Distinct written forms7

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 真栄 forms2

Adjacent 栄真 forms1

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

真栄

Masae

まさえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 栄Given name

真理栄

Marie

まりえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 栄Given name

真喜栄

Makie

まきえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 栄Given name

栄真

Ema

えま

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 栄Given name

真夏栄

Manae

まなえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 栄Given name

真栄

Mae

まえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 栄Given name

栄真

Eishin

えいしん

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 栄Given name

真実栄

Mamie

まみえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 栄Given name

真栄子

Maeko

まえこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 栄Given name

真栄

Shin'ei

しんえい

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 栄

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.