Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

真

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 10 strokes

true, reality, Buddhist sect

史

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 5 strokes

history, chronicle

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both11

Distinct written forms5

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 真史 forms2

Adjacent 史真 forms2

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

真史

Masashi

まさし

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 真 and 史Given name

真史

Manami

まなみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 史Given name

真史

Shinji

しんじ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 史Given name

真史

Mao

まお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 史Given name

史真

Shima

しま

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 史Given name

史真子

Shimako

しまこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 史Given name

真史

Masafumi

まさふみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 史Given name

真史

Masahito

まさひと

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 史Given name

真史

Mafumi

まふみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 史Given name

真史子

Mashiko

ましこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 真 and 史

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.