Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
田
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 5 strokes
貴rice field, rice paddy
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 6 · 12 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →precious, value, prize
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
冨貴田
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameFukita
ふきた
貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameKida
きだ
田貴
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameTaki
たき
貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameKita
きた
戸貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameTokita
ときた
真貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameMakita
まきた
貴師田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameKishida
きしだ
貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameTakada
たかだ
貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameTokida
ときだ
富貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameFukida
ふきだ
福貴田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameFukukita
ふくきた
貴田岡
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴SurnameKitaoka
きたおか
山田貴
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 田 and 貴Yamataki
やまたき
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.