Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

生

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 5 strokes

life, genuine, birth

都

Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 10 · 11 strokes

capital, metropolis

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both11

Distinct written forms8

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 生都 forms1

Adjacent 都生 forms5

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

都沚生

Toshio

としお

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 生 and 都Given name

都生

Satomi

さとみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 生 and 都Given name

都生子

Tokiko

ときこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 生 and 都Given name

都生子

Tomoko

ともこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 生 and 都Given name

依都生

Itsuki

いつき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 生 and 都Given name

美都生

Mitsuo

みつお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 生 and 都Given name

都築生

Tokio

ときお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 生 and 都Given name

生都子

Itoko

いとこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 生 and 都Given name

伊都生

Itsuo

いつお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 生 and 都Given name

都生

Toi

とい

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 生 and 都

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.