Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

津

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes

haven, port, harbor

留

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 10 strokes

detain, fasten, halt

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both15

Distinct written forms14

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 津留 forms12

Adjacent 留津 forms2

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

実津留

Mitsuru

みつる

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 津 and 留Given name

千津留

Chizuru

ちずる

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 津 and 留Given name

津留実

Tsurumi

つるみ

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 津 and 留Given name

留津子

Rutsuko

るつこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 留Given name

姿津留

Shizuru

しづる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 留Given name

日津留

Hizuru

ひづる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 留Given name

留津

Rutsu

るつ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 留Given name

津留江

Tsurue

つるえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 留Given name

津留

Tsuru

つる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 留Given name

津留子

Tsuruko

つるこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 留

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.