Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

津

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes

haven, port, harbor

波

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 8 strokes

waves, billows, Poland

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both10

Distinct written forms10

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 津波 forms4

Adjacent 波津 forms6

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

津波沙

Tsubasa

つばさ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 波Given name

波津子

Hatsuko

はつこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 波Given name

波津江

Hatsue

はつえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 波Given name

小波津

Konatsu

こなつ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 波Given name

津波

Tsunami

つなみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 波Given name

衣津波

Itsuha

いつは

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 波Given name

以津波

Izuha

いづは

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 波Given name

波津

Hatsu

はつ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 波Given name

波津路

Hatsuji

はつじ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 波Given name

波津女

Hatsume

はつめ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 津 and 波

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.