Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

泰

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 10 strokes

peaceful, calm, peace

一

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 1 strokes

one, one radical (no.1)

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both11

Distinct written forms4

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 泰一 forms3

Adjacent 一泰 forms1

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

泰一朗

Taīchirō

たいいちろう

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 泰 and 一Given name

一泰

Kazuyoshi

かずよし

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 泰 and 一Given name

一泰

Kazuhiro

かずひろ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 泰 and 一Given name

泰一

Hirokazu

ひろかず

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 泰 and 一Given name

泰一

Yasukazu

やすかず

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 泰 and 一Given name

一泰

Kazuyasu

かずやす

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 泰 and 一Given name

泰一郎

Taichirō

たいちろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 泰 and 一Given name

泰一

Yasuichi

やすいち

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 泰 and 一Given name

泰一

Taīchi

たいいち

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 泰 and 一Given name

泰一郎

Yasuichirō

やすいちろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 泰 and 一

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.