Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
枝
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 8 strokes
利bough, branch, twig
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 7 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →profit, advantage, benefit
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
枝利佳
7 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameErika
えりか
亜枝利
6 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameAeri
あえり
万利枝
4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameMarie
まりえ
枝利名
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameErina
えりな
優利枝
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameYurie
ゆりえ
利志枝
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameToshie
としえ
利枝
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameYoshie
よしえ
枝利子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameEriko
えりこ
利枝
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameRie
りえ
枝利
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameEri
えり
利枝子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameRieko
りえこ
恵利枝
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Given nameErī
えりい
利喜枝
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 枝 and 利Rikie
りきえ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.