Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
東
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 8 strokes
郎east
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →son, counter for sons
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
東二郎
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Given nameTōjirō
とうじろう
東郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Given nameHaruo
はるお
東志二郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Given nameToshijirō
としじろう
東一郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Given nameTōichirō
とういちろう
東太郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Given nameTōtarō
とうたろう
東四郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Given nameTōshirō
とうしろう
東九郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Given nameTōkurō
とうくろう
東三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Given nameTōzaburō
とうざぶろう
東五郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Given nameTōgorō
とうごろう
東十郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Given nameTōjūrō
とうじゅうろう
東郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Given nameTōrō
とうろう
東三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 東 and 郎Tōsaburō
とうさぶろう
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.