Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
Characters recorded with 杉
Only partners appearing in at least two distinct source-recorded written forms are highlighted here. That threshold keeps one-off combinations from looking more established than the corpus supports.
杉 + 尾
5 distinct written forms · 5 source rows
0 given-name readings · 2 surname readings杉 + 原
4 distinct written forms · 6 source rows
0 given-name readings · 4 surname readings杉 + 目
4 distinct written forms · 4 source rows
0 given-name readings · 1 surname readings杉 + 野
3 distinct written forms · 4 source rows
1 given-name readings · 3 surname readings杉 + 本
2 distinct written forms · 4 source rows
0 given-name readings · 4 surname readings杉 + 之
2 distinct written forms · 2 source rows
0 given-name readings · 2 surname readings杉 + 井
2 distinct written forms · 2 source rows
0 given-name readings · 2 surname readings杉 + 元
2 distinct written forms · 2 source rows
0 given-name readings · 2 surname readings杉 + 子
2 distinct written forms · 2 source rows
2 given-name readings · 0 surname readings杉 + 木
2 distinct written forms · 2 source rows
0 given-name readings · 2 surname readings杉 + 森
2 distinct written forms · 2 source rows
0 given-name readings · 2 surname readings杉 + 生
2 distinct written forms · 2 source rows
1 given-name readings · 1 surname readings杉 + 矢
2 distinct written forms · 2 source rows
0 given-name readings · 2 surname readings杉 + 貴
2 distinct written forms · 2 source rows
0 given-name readings · 2 surname readings杉 + 香
2 distinct written forms · 2 source rows
2 given-name readings · 0 surname readingsCo-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.