Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
智
Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 9 · 12 strokes
郎wisdom, intellect, reason
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →son, counter for sons
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
智二郎
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Given nameTomojirō
ともじろう
晴委智郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Given nameSeīchirō
せいいちろう
智郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Given nameTomō
ともお
伊智郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Given nameIchirō
いちろう
智治郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Given nameToshijirō
としじろう
志智郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Given nameShichirō
しちろう
智一郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Given nameTomoichirō
ともいちろう
智三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Given nameTomosaburō
ともさぶろう
智三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Given nameChisaburō
ちさぶろう
智太郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Given nameTomotarō
ともたろう
智郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Given nameChirō
ちろう
智士郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 智 and 郎Tomoshirō
ともしろう
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.