Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
明
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 8 strokes
田bright, light
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 5 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →rice field, rice paddy
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
明田川
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameAkitagawa
あきたがわ
明田川
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameAkitakawa
あきたかわ
明田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameAkita
あきた
明田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameTomoda
ともだ
明田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameAkida
あきだ
明田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameAgeta
あげた
明田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameAkata
あかた
明田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameAkada
あかだ
明田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameAkeda
あけだ
明田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameAketa
あけた
明田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameMeida
めいだ
明田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 明 and 田SurnameMeita
めいた
明田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 明 and 田Myōda
みょうだ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.