Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
日
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 4 strokes
実day, sun, Japan
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 8 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →reality, truth, seed
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
日富実
4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameHitomi
ひとみ
日奈実
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameHinami
ひなみ
亜日実
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameAsumi
あすみ
日実加
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameHimika
ひみか
実日
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameMika
みか
春日実
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameKasumi
かすみ
温日実
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameHarumi
はるみ
実日子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameMikako
みかこ
友実日
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameYumika
ゆみか
日出実
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameHidemi
ひでみ
日実子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameHimiko
ひみこ
今日実
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Given nameKyōmi
きょうみ
日歩実
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 日 and 実Hifumi
ひふみ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.