Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
愛
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 13 strokes
利love, affection, favourite
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 7 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →profit, advantage, benefit
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
愛恵利
4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameAeri
あえり
愛実利
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameAmiri
あみり
友利愛
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameYuria
ゆりあ
実愛利
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameMiari
みあり
愛夏利
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameAkari
あかり
愛利左
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameArisa
ありさ
愛利
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameAiri
あいり
愛利子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameEriko
えりこ
愛利
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameEri
えり
結利愛
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameYurie
ゆりえ
真利愛
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameMaria
まりあ
愛友利
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Given nameAyuri
あゆり
愛利子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 愛 and 利Ariko
ありこ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.