Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
恒
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes
郎constancy, always
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →son, counter for sons
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
恒一郎
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Given nameKōichirō
こういちろう
恒二郎
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Given nameKōjirō
こうじろう
恒二郎
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Given nameTsunejirō
つねじろう
恒多郎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Given nameKōtarō
こうたろう
恒郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Given nameHisao
ひさお
恒郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Given nameTsuneo
つねお
恒三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Given nameKōzaburō
こうざぶろう
恒四郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Given nameKōshirō
こうしろう
恒次郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Given nameNobujirō
のぶじろう
恒一郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Given nameTsuneichirō
つねいちろう
恒郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Given nameTsunerō
つねろう
恒三郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 恒 and 郎Tsunesaburō
つねさぶろう
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.