Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

志

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 7 strokes

intention, plan, resolve

富

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 12 strokes

wealth, enrich, abundant

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both12

Distinct written forms11

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 志富 forms1

Adjacent 富志 forms9

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

富志枝

Toshie

としえ

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 志 and 富Given name

富志男

Fujio

ふじお

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 志 and 富Given name

富志雄

Toshio

としお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 富Given name

富志子

Toshiko

としこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 富Given name

志乃富

Shinobu

しのぶ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 富Given name

富志美

Toshimi

としみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 富Given name

富志子

Fujiko

ふじこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 富Given name

富志世

Toshiyo

としよ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 富Given name

富志

Fuji

ふじ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 富Given name

志富

Shitomi

しとみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 富

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.