Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

志

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 7 strokes

intention, plan, resolve

夫

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 4 strokes

husband, man

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both27

Distinct written forms26

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 志夫 forms20

Adjacent 夫志 forms0

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

刀志夫

Toshio

としお

7 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 志 and 夫Given name

与志夫

Yoshio

よしお

4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 志 and 夫Given name

志夫利

Shiori

しおり

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 志 and 夫Given name

志寿夫

Shizuo

しずお

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 志 and 夫Given name

喜志夫

Kishio

きしお

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 志 and 夫Given name

志乃夫

Shinobu

しのぶ

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 志 and 夫Given name

志夫

Yukio

ゆきお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 夫Given name

志計夫

Shigeo

しげお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 夫Given name

不志夫

Fujio

ふじお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 夫Given name

葉志夫

Hashio

はしお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 志 and 夫

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.