Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

弥

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 8 strokes

all the more, increasingly

希

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 7 strokes

hope, beg, request

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both11

Distinct written forms10

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 弥希 forms2

Adjacent 希弥 forms3

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

弥小希

Misaki

みさき

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 弥 and 希Given name

弥希

Miki

みき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弥 and 希Given name

希弥子

Kimiko

きみこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弥 and 希Given name

弥希子

Mikiko

みきこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弥 and 希Given name

弥希

Mitsuki

みつき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弥 and 希Given name

希弥

Nozomi

のぞみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弥 and 希Given name

希弥香

Kimika

きみか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弥 and 希Given name

弥舞希

Mibuki

みぶき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弥 and 希Given name

弥瑠希

Miruki

みるき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弥 and 希Given name

弥奈希

Yanagi

やなぎ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弥 and 希

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.