Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
弓
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 3 strokes
子bow, bow (archery, violin)
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 3 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →child, sign of the rat, 11PM-1AM
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
弓希子
6 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Given nameYukiko
ゆきこ
弓子
5 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Given nameYumiko
ゆみこ
眞弓子
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Given nameMayuko
まゆこ
弓哉子
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Given nameYukako
ゆかこ
弓理子
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Given nameYuriko
ゆりこ
文弓子
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Given nameFuyuko
ふゆこ
江弓子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Given nameEmiko
えみこ
弓美子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Given nameYūko
ゆうこ
亜弓子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Given nameAyako
あやこ
愛弓子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Given nameAyuko
あゆこ
奈弓子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Given nameNayuko
なゆこ
麗弓子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 弓 and 子Riyūko
りゆうこ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.