Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

希

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 7 strokes

hope, beg, request

華

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 10 strokes

splendor, flower, petal

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both11

Distinct written forms7

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 希華 forms3

Adjacent 華希 forms1

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

希実華

Kimika

きみか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 希 and 華Given name

希望華

Asuka

あすか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 希 and 華Given name

希代華

Kiyoka

きよか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 希 and 華Given name

希華

Nonoka

ののか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 希 and 華Given name

希華

Ichika

いちか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 希 and 華Given name

華希

Kano

かの

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 希 and 華Given name

早希華

Sakika

さきか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 希 and 華Given name

希華子

Kikako

きかこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 希 and 華Given name

華希

Hanaki

はなき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 希 and 華Given name

希華

Mareka

まれか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 希 and 華

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.