Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
崎
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 11 strokes
戸promontory, cape, spit
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 4 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →door, counter for houses, door radical (no. 63)
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
戸ヶ崎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸SurnameTogasaki
とがさき
城戸崎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸SurnameKidosaki
きどさき
戸崎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸SurnameTosaki
とさき
戸崎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸SurnameTozaki
とざき
戸ノ崎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸SurnameTonosaki
とのさき
井戸崎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸SurnameItozaki
いとざき
大戸崎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸SurnameŌtozaki
おおとざき
戸矢崎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸SurnameToyasaki
とやさき
崎戸
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸SurnameSakito
さきと
戸井崎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸SurnameToizaki
といざき
戸ノ崎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸SurnameTonozaki
とのざき
戸矢崎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 崎 and 戸Toyazaki
とやざき
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.