Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

尚

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 8 strokes

esteem, furthermore, still

一

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 1 strokes

one, one radical (no.1)

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both12

Distinct written forms3

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 尚一 forms3

Adjacent 一尚 forms0

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

尚一朗

Shōichirō

しょういちろう

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 尚 and 一Given name

尚一朗

Shun'ichirō

しゅんいちろう

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 尚 and 一Given name

尚一

Shōichi

しょういち

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 尚 and 一Given name

尚一

Takakazu

たかかず

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 尚 and 一Given name

尚一

Hisakazu

ひさかず

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 尚 and 一Given name

尚一

Takaichi

たかいち

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 尚 and 一Given name

尚一

Naokazu

なおかず

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 尚 and 一Given name

尚一

Hisaichi

ひさいち

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 尚 and 一Given name

尚一

Naoichi

なおいち

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 尚 and 一Given name

尚一郎

Naoichirō

なおいちろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 尚 and 一

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.