Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

実

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 8 strokes

reality, truth, seed

流

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 10 strokes

current, a sink, flow

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both11

Distinct written forms11

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 実流 forms3

Adjacent 流実 forms6

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

流実子

Rumiko

るみこ

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 実 and 流Given name

波流実

Harumi

はるみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 実 and 流Given name

実千流

Michiru

みちる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 実 and 流Given name

奈流実

Narumi

なるみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 実 and 流Given name

天流実

Terumi

てるみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 実 and 流Given name

彗実流

Emiru

えみる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 実 and 流Given name

実流空

Miruku

みるく

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 実 and 流Given name

実久流

Mikuru

みくる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 実 and 流Given name

実流

Miru

みる

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 実 and 流Given name

舞流実

Marumi

まるみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 実 and 流

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.