Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
季
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 8 strokes
沙seasons
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 7 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →sand
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
実沙季
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameMisaki
みさき
千沙季
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameChisaki
ちさき
季沙恵
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameKisae
きさえ
亜季沙
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameArisa
ありさ
沙季
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameSaki
さき
沙季子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameSakiko
さきこ
沙都季
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameSatsuki
さつき
亜季沙
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameAkisa
あきさ
沙由季
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameSayuki
さゆき
季沙
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameKisa
きさ
緋沙季
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameHisaki
ひさき
季沙子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Given nameKisako
きさこ
沙季夏
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 沙Sakika
さきか
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.